Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & Jonas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1976Published

1DissentFuchsberg, J.

The question before us is not whether this contract, or even its arbitration clause, is valid, but rather, whether appellant, who was legally an infant when he signed it, had the capacity to make such a contract. In our view, the majority has overlooked this distinction entirely.

In its proper context, arbitration is supported by strong statutory and decisional policy (Matter of Weinrott [Carp] 32 NY2d 190; Matter of National Equip. Rental [American Pecco Corp.] 28 NY2d 639; Hirsch v Hirsch, 37 NY2d 312; Board of Educ., Union Free School Dist No. 3, Town of Huntington v Associated Teachers of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Lentine v. FundaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API