Legal Opinion

Seeley v. Seeley-Howe-Le Van Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from PoTk District Court.— Hon. Tames A. Howe, -Tuclge. The opinion states tbe material facts of tbe case. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In March, 1901, one C. H. Seeley was engaged in business as a dry goods merchant at Des Moines, Iowa. At the same time W. It. Howe and O. D. Le Van were engaged in a similar business in the State of New York These parties at the date mentioned entered into a written .contract for the organization of a corporation which should take over their several stocks of goods and carry ' on the united business at’ Des Moines under the corporate business name.of Seeley-Howe-Le Van Company, with an authorized capital stock of $100,000. The organization was perfected in May, 1901. The goods and fixtures…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davenport Plow Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Bradley v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Jones v. CrosthwaiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Allen ex rel. Stephens v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  5. Jones v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. OelkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Farnsworth v. Muscatine Produce & Pure Ice Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. McKee v. Harwood Automotive Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Independent Van & Storage Co. v. Iowa Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Friar v. Rae-Chandler Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API