Legal Opinion
Goldfinger v. Doherty
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 13, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant Doherty, dis-affirming certain purchases of stock, made in her behalf by her duly authorized agent, alleging that she was an infant at the time of the transactions and that she now elected to rescind and offered to return the stock, together with the stock and cash dividends received thereon. The defendant Doherty thereupon obtained an order permitting him to serve a supplemental summons and complaint on the agent Samuel Goldfinger, pursuant to section 193, subdivision 2, of the Civil Practice Act. No question is raised on this appeal with reference to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shields v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StotskyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Gervis v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Ezersky v. SurvisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Express Publishing Co. v. LevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.