Legal Opinion

Rosenow v. Shutrump & Associates

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2005No. 04-MA-180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donofrio, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Paul Rosenow, appeals from a Mahoning County-Common Pleas Court order granting summary judgment in favor of defendantappellee, Shutrump & Associates (“Shutrump”), and third-party defendant-appellee, C & R Builders (“C & R”).

{¶ 2} On January 16, 1998, appellant and Shutrump entered into a purchase agreement for the construction of a residence in Austintown, Ohio. During negotiations of the contract, appellant had the option of choosing between a maintenance plan and a one-year builder’s warranty. Appellant opted for the one-year warranty.

{¶ 3} On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cole v. American Industries & Resources Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Francosky v. Customized Vinyl SalesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Spagnola v. Spagnola, 07 Ma 178 (6-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Quetot v. M&M Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. DEFRANK v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API