Legal Opinion

Julian B. Slevin Company v. Bartgis Brothers Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 28, 1956No. Civ. 8040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is a typical patent suit in which plaintiffs claim that defendant is infringing plaintiffs’ patent by making, using and selling bottle carriers embodying the patented invention, and defendant raises the issues of validity and infringement. More than a year after answering, defendant now moves for leave to amend its answer by adding thereto a counterclaim. The proposed counterclaim is an informer action under 35 U.S.C.A. § 292; it charges plaintiffs with false marking, and asks the court (1) to assess against plaintiffs the statutory fine for each offense found to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. London v. Everett H. Dunbar Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910
  2. Calderwood v. MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
  3. Hat-Sweat Manuf'g Co. v. Davis Sewing-Machine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1887
  4. Pentlarge v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1884
  5. Zuckerman v. PilotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Aparicio v. PeñagarícanoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Hardinge Company, Inc. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. HY-Grade Valve, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  5. Lugash v. Santa Anita Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API