Pentlarge v. Kirby
District Court, S.D. New York
Demurrer to Complaint. .
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
These six actions were brought to recover 10 penalties of $100 in each of the six suits, under section 1901 of the Revised Statutes, for falsely stamping upon certain nnpatented wooden vent bungs the words “Pat. Nov. 28, 1882,” with intent to deceive the public. The section above referred to imposes upon every person “who in any manner marks upon or affixes to any unpatented article the word ‘patent,’ or any word importing that the same is patented, for the purpose of deceiving the public, a penalty of $100 for each article so stamped; one-half of said penalty to the use of the person who…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dudley v. . MayhewNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- United States v. FurlongSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- United States v. TempleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- People Ex Rel. Hatzel v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Almy v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1809
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Felt ex rel. United States v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
- Julian B. Slevin Company v. Bartgis Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Stauffer v. Brooks Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.