Legal Opinion
Hardinge Company, Inc. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1958No. Civ. A. 15624PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant has infringed plaintiff’s rights granted under letters patent numbered 2,235,-928 and 2,381,351. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338.
The matter here under consideration is defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. By this motion the defendant raises for the first time — not having done so previously in his answer to the complaint — the defense of “unclean hands”. The defendant’s motion — based on the pleadings, defendant’s discovery record,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sarnoff v. CiagliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- F.A.R. Liquidating Corp. v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Smith v. GehringCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Continental Aircraft Sales v. McDermott Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- General Industries Co. v. Birmingham Sound Reproducers, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.