Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 1979No. 8392PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
On January 27, 1977, a division of this court affirmed a $750 deficiency judgment against appellants, Joseph and Antoinette Randolph. 368 A.2d 1151. The appellee finance company, Franklin Investment Co., Inc. (Franklin), had repossessed their automobile, resold it, and then sued to recover the difference between the proceeds of the sale and the balance due on the Randolphs’ note. We vacated the division’s opinion and granted the petition for rehearing en banc because of the “exceptional importance,” D.C.App.R. 40, of resolving certain issues inherent in automobile…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- John W. Skeels v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation v. Estelle A. Skeels, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bernstein v. FernandezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.