Turudic v. Stephens
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
These are consolidated appeals from the trial court’s judgment on the merits (A95493) and from the court’s subsequent denial of motions to set aside that judgment and for sanctions (A106404). The principal issue on the first, “merits” appeal is whether the plaintiffs’ keeping of two pet cougars on their property violated the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) of a subdivision. We affirm the denial of post-judgment relief in A106404. However, on the “merits” appeal, A95493, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
The material facts are as follows:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Scott Co. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Aldridge v. SaxeyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Swanson v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levasseur v. ArmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Goldberger v. State FarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- LEVASSEUR v. ArmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010