Legal Opinion

McCard v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2003No. 02-255PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Joshia L. MeCard (McCard), appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere prior to the imposition of sentence. We will affirm, concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying that motion.

ISSUES

[¶2] McCard articulates this issue:

Did the district court abuse its discretion when it refused to grant [MecCard's] motion to [withdraw] his nolo contendere plea before sentencing?

The State reformulates the issue only slightly:

Whether the district court properly denied [MeCard's]…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Frame v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ecker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Winsted v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dobbins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jerele Craig Cothren, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API