Legal Opinion

Ecker v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1976No. 4503PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant-appellant complains of the denial of his motion, made at the time set by the trial court for sentencing, to withdraw his plea of guilty. He claims he was promised probation and dismissal by the county attorney of one count of a two-count information if he pled guilty to the other count. His reason for his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty was that he was apprehensive about whether he would in fact receive probation. The trial judge extensively advised the defendant of his constitutional rights at an initial arraignment when defendant entered pleas of not guilty to both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur NeedlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Jack Lee WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Roberto Antonio FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Rene ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. David Alex Burnett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Zanetti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hanson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API