Frame v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[T1] Appellant, Ricky Lynn Frame, seeks review of the judgment and sentence entered against him upon his plea of guilty to the crime of larceny as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-402(a) and (0)(i) (LexisNexis 2001). Frame's sole contention is that the district court abused its discretion in 'denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which was filed before sentencing.
[12] We will affirm.
[13] The parties articulate the single issue to be resolved in virtually identical terms. The clearest statement of the issue is: Did the district court abuse its discretion in denying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Brock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Burdine v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Dichard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by24 opinions
- Major v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Van Haele v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Doles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- McCard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.