McGee v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
PAUL C. MURPHY, Chief Justice.
We withdraw our opinion filed January 20, 2000, substitute the following in its place, and overrule appellant’s motion for rehearing.
In this case, we decide if evidence seized from a suspect’s anal region should have been suppressed. Because we do not find sufficient information in the record to support the trial court’s ruling allowing the admission of the evidence, we reverse its decision and remand this case for further proceedings.
I. Factual Summary
Houston Police Officer Steven Rowan was contacted one evening by a concerned citizen who told…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Richards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Sargent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.