Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided February 28, 2001No. 03-99-00712-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Alejandro Ramirez appeals from his conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 46.04 (West 1994). Before a trial on the merits, Ramirez filed a motion to suppress statements he allegedly made on the night of the offense. In a single point of error, Ramirez argues that the trial court erred in admitting his confession by failing to determine if the police officers scrupulously honored his right to remain silent as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478-79, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We overrule the point of error and affirm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Maestas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. McCulley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  4. Ismael DeLeon Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  5. Ismael DeLeon Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API