Legal Opinion
United States v. Science Applications International Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 2009No. Civil Action 05-1757 (RMC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Thomas O’Neill Morgan instituted this suit in September 2005, alleging that Science Applications International Co. (“SAIC”) and SPARTA, Inc. (“SPARTA”), both federal contractors, violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3728 et seq. (“FCA ”). After years of impossibly slow investigation, the United States declined to intervene in June 2008. Although represented by counsel when the complaint was filed and throughout the investigation, Mr. Morgan has been proceeding pro se since September 2008, when prior counsel withdrew. He now has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Macharia, Merania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Schneider v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016