Legal Opinion

Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 18, 2014No. 14-5047PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Gary Vander Boegh applied for a job with EnergySolutions. He alleges that the prospective employer did not hire him because he engaged in protected whistle-blower activity at a prior job. The district court held that Vander Boegh lacked statutory standing as an applicant — not employee — and granted summary judgment in favor of EnergySolutions. Because we agree that Vander Boegh lacks statutory standing under the Energy Reorganization Act and False Claims Act, and we lack subject-matter jurisdiction over the remaining claims, we affirm.

I

The U.S. Department of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Kevin Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Geraldine Burley v. Jeffery GagackiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Michigan Flyer LLC v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Jennifer Mason v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Sarah CalvettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API