Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Gary Vander Boegh applied for a job with EnergySolutions. He alleges that the prospective employer did not hire him because he engaged in protected whistle-blower activity at a prior job. The district court held that Vander Boegh lacked statutory standing as an applicant — not employee — and granted summary judgment in favor of EnergySolutions. Because we agree that Vander Boegh lacks statutory standing under the Energy Reorganization Act and False Claims Act, and we lack subject-matter jurisdiction over the remaining claims, we affirm.
I
The U.S. Department of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Kevin Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Geraldine Burley v. Jeffery GagackiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Michigan Flyer LLC v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Jennifer Mason v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Sarah CalvettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.