Legal Opinion

United Producers' Pipe Line Co. v. Britton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1924No. 1619. [fn*]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, O. J.

The Producers’ Pipe Line Company instituted this action of interpleader and as grounds therefor alleged:

That A. G. Britton recovered a judgment against it in the sum of $1,890.08; that it has been abstracted in Tarrant county apd is a cloud on the lands and properties of the plaintiff; that of said judgment has been assigned to the First State Bank of Eastland, $985.08; to M. F. Babb, $905, and that certain others, naming them, had caused writs of garnishments to be served upon it, and others had filed orders with plaintiff from said Britton on plaintiff for sums alleged to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marvin v. EllwoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  2. Melton v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. BrimSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Nash v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Farmers State Bank of Meridian v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. American Surety Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API