Legal Opinion
Titan Metal Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 20, 1939No. 6789PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The protagonists in the field of labor economics concede, as they must, that it does take two to make a bargain. As to one of the two, the other has allowed its sense of advantage to overcome its sense of reality. A restoration of balance has raised the problem of the “so-called company union”. The use of the expression outlines the controversy. One side would substitute “correctly” for the conventional “so” and the other prefers the contrasting “employees association”. The emphasis follows the point of view. It is interesting to note that the famous section 7(a) (2) of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Union Drawn Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.