Legal Opinion
Franko v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 2, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9225PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Circie Franko brings this appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of defendant James M. Mitchell on Franko’s claims for breach of contract for professional legal services and legal malpractice.
ISSUES
To resolve the appeal, we must determine the following issues: (1) whether there existed genuine issues of material fact concerning the alleged attorney-client relationship between Mitchell and Franko; (2) whether there existed genuine issues of material fact concerning Franko’s contention that she was an intended third-party contract beneficiary; (3)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Toy v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.