How J. Ryan & Associates, Inc. v. Century Brewing Ass'n
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover for services rendered. A trial was had to a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment was entered on the verdict, and the defendant has appealed therefrom.
The respondent’s theory, as revealed by the complaint upon which the case was tried, the evidence offered and received and the instructions requested and given, is briefly outlined in the following:
Respondent, a corporation, is an advertising agency offering its services to the public generally for compensation. It was invited, in September, 1933, to submit to the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Thomas v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Seay v. VialpandoWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.