Legal Opinion

Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 5, 1944No. 37382PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeedy, J.

We adhere to the views expressed in, and readopt' that portion of the opinion written, by Bohling, C., in Division II, which later became the opinion of the court en banc on the former submission of this cause en banc, all as indicated by the quoted matter following:

“The action'arises out of an alleged contract. Defendant operates a large department store in St. Louis. Plaintiff’s'petition alleged that he ‘devised a plan for an employee’s sales campaign and contest,’ and in March, 1930, ‘offered said plan for sale’ to defendant ‘as a means of increasing’ defendant’s business; ‘that said pi…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Fashion Originators Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Masline v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cygan v. MegathlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API