Legal Opinion

Ablah v. Eyman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1961No. 42,309PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This case involves the working papers of a public accountant. The action was in replevin to recover certain books and records alleged to be owned by appellees, plaintiffs below, to which appellant, defendant below, filed his third amended cross petition with his third amended answer. The amended cross petition contained four causes of action: The first sought to recover actual damages for “the value of the use” of the property alleged to have been sustained by appellant, based upon “the usable value and money savings to the plaintiffs” by…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Swindler, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Foster v. HumburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Wilbur A. Sale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Application of HouseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City and County of Denver v. Desert Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API