Legal Opinion

State v. Broom

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2009No. 2009-1567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellee, Romell Broom, claims that at his trial for aggravated murder, evidence favorable to him was suppressed in violation of Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215. Having failed to raise this claim on his first petition for postconviction relief, he attempted to raise it in a successive petition. The court of appeals held that Broom was entitled to do so. We disagree and reverse.

{¶ 2} Broom was convicted of the 1984 aggravated murder of 14-year-old Tryna Middleton, with kidnapping and rape specifications, and was sentenced to death. The court of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. DeLost v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API