State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether the state is barred by the Cruel and Unusual Punishments and Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions from carrying out the death penalty against Romell Broom when attempts to insert an IV catheter were unsuccessful in an earlier scheduled execution. We hold that the state is not barred from carrying out his execution and therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Case Background
{¶ 2} On October 3, 1985, a jury convicted appellant, Romell Broom, of aggravated murder with two felony-murder…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Ohio v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Noling (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Pendleton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.