Snashall Et Ux v. Jewell Et Ux
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This suit was brought to enjoin defendants from maintaining a dwelling house which it is alleged violated a restrictive covenant contained in defendants’ deed against the construction of “more than one' single story dwelling.” The trial court denied the injunction but awarded plaintiffs damages in the amount of $2,500. Defendants appeal.
Both plaintiffs and defendants received their deeds from common grantors, Nosier and Powell, who owned k trket of land lying along S.W. Altadena Avenue and S.W. Washouga Avenue in the Council Crest area of Portland. The tract was located on a slope providing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by13 opinions
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Drulard v. LeTourneauOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- McNamee v. Bishop Trust Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.