Legal Opinion

Snashall Et Ux v. Jewell Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This suit was brought to enjoin defendants from maintaining a dwelling house which it is alleged violated a restrictive covenant contained in defendants’ deed against the construction of “more than one' single story dwelling.” The trial court denied the injunction but awarded plaintiffs damages in the amount of $2,500. Defendants appeal.

Both plaintiffs and defendants received their deeds from common grantors, Nosier and Powell, who owned k trket of land lying along S.W. Altadena Avenue and S.W. Washouga Avenue in the Council Crest area of Portland. The tract was located on a slope providing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  2. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Drulard v. LeTourneauOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. McNamee v. Bishop Trust Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API