Legal Opinion

In re Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Applioation. to disbar the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

Charges against the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, were presented by the Bar Association and referred to a referee, who has filed his report. These charges grew out of the relation of the respondent to two contracts for the sale of the same piece of real property in the city of Hew York. It seems that title to this property was held by one Wedgfuth for the benefit of the respond^ ent and his wife. The respondent’s wife, however, seems to have had nothing to do with the transactions, leaving it all to the respondent, who acted as if he was the owner of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re PopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. In re SchildhausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. In re HeymannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API