In re Heymann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Charges 'presented by the Association of the Bar of the City .of New York of professional misconduct against the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
Respondent is charged with having filed or caused to be filed in the office of the clerk of the Municipal Court what purported to be a satisfaction of a judgment against a hotel company and the respondent personally, which instrument purported to be signed and acknowledged by Robert C. Durland, the attorney for the judgment creditor, and which stated that the judgment had been fully paid, and with having received from the clerk of the Municipal Court a certificate of the satisfaction of the judgment, which he filed in the office of the county clerk of the county of New York.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Purcell v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944