Legal Opinion
In re Schildhaus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counsellor at law in this Department on October 16, 1933. This disciplinary proceeding was instituted against him under subdivision 2 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law. The matter was duly referred to a Referee with direction to take testimony as to the charges and report thereon to this court. The Referee, on the basis of a comprehensive and well-reasoned report, concluded that Charges I, II and III, as alleged in the petition and amended petition were not sustained, but that Charges IV, V and VI, as alleged in the supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Matter of RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In re AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re KunstlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re ShearerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re KassnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Klein v. SeenauthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999