Legal Opinion

Lott v. Kees

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1964No. 1 Div. 177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal from a final decree of the circuit court of Mobile County, in equity, presents for consideration, under appropriate assignments of error, Aspect C of the bill of complaint, as amended.

This aspect of the suit seeks to have (8) oil, gas and mineral leases executed by appellants (the Lotts) to appellees (the Kees) declared null and void because the only consideration for each of the leases sought to be set aside was a champertous agreement of the lessees (the Kees) to hire a lawyer and pay all expenses of a lawsuit, if necessary, to clear title to the land leased, namely, a vacant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Boardman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Dahms v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Gilbert v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Bentinck v. FranklieTexas Supreme Court · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Harry Martin, Zarnoff O. Samford and Martin Trailer Toters, Inc. v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Robertson v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Jarrouj v. LJS Realty, Inc.Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988
  5. Rucker v. OASIS LEGAL FINANCE, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API