Legal Opinion
Asarco LLC v. England Logistics Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 23, 2014No. CV-13-00686-TUC-CRPPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. PYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action arises from a shipment of 55 copper anodes that went missing. ASAR-CO alleges that in July 2011, ASARCO requested that Defendants CR England, Inc. (“CR”) and England Logistics (“EL”) arrange for transport of 55 copper anodes from ASARCO’s facility in Hayden, Arizona, to ASARCO’s facility in Amarillo, Texas (“the Shipment”). (First Amended Complaint, (“FAC”) ¶¶ 29; Doc. 101, p. 5). ASARCO alleges that CR/EL unilaterally re-brokered and/or re-assigned the Shipment to Defendant Plumley Trucking, Inc., (“PT”) who, thereafter,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Creagan v. Wal-Mart Transp., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
- Alpine Fresh, Inc. v. Jala Trucking Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Nyswaner v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Freight Tec Management v. ChemexCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Total Quality Logistics, L.L.C. v. Red Chamber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.