Legal Opinion

Husbands v. Elam

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERNEST E. COCHRAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy, filed his complaint in this court on two causes of action to set aside, under the provisions of section 67e of the Bankruptcy *118Act (Comp. St. § 9651), a mortgage executed by the bankrupt to the defendant on certain real estate in this district and a deed subsequently executed by the bankrupt conveying the same property to the defendant, and to recover the property and subject the same to the debts of the bankrupt. Thereupon he had a subpoena ad respondendum issued, in the usual form of such subpoenas on the equity side…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. CITIZENS'SAV. & TR. CO. v. Illinois Cent. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S. B. McMaster, Inc. v. Chevrolet Motor Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
  2. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1930
  3. Thomas v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API