Legal Opinion
Pourzal v. Marriott International, Inc.
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided February 25, 2004No. CIV.2001-140PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, District Judge
MEMORANDUM
Defendant Marriott International, Inc. moves to dismiss plaintiffs claims for tortious interference with prospective advantage, prima facie tort, and civil conspiracy under Rule 12(b)(6). After considering the parties’ oral arguments and written motions, I will dismiss the claims of prima facie tort and civil conspiracy because they fail to state a claim on which relief can be granted. I will dismiss the plaintiffs claims for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage without prejudice and grant him leave to amend his claims for tortious interference.
I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fred Piecknick v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sturm v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Albany Insurance v. Almacenadora Somex, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Clayman v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts WorldwideDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Hartzog ex rel. Perez v. United Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Pourzal v. Prime Hospitality Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2006
- Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.