Legal Opinion

Pourzal v. Prime Hospitality Corp.

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided October 30, 2006No. Civil No. 1999-139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGomez, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(October 30, 2006)

Before the Court is the motion of the defendant Prime Hospitality Corporation (“Prime”) to dismiss Count II and Count in of the Second Amended Complaint of the plaintiff Nick Pourzal (“Pourzal”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pourzal claims that in 1978, a family by the name of Gilbert agreed to sell him a sixteen acre lot (hereinafter the “Gilbert land”). Instead of purchasing the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
In Re Rosemary BROWN, Debtor. FIRST JERSEY NATIONAL BANK v. Rosemary BROWN, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Newman v. McKaySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
Titan Medical Group, LLC v. Virgin Islands Government Hospitals and Health Facilities CorporationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2021