Legal Opinion
United States v. Roebling
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 29, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 848-62PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Chief Judge:
This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate wherein the United States of America as vendor seeks to compel the defendant Ferdinand W. Roebling, III as vendee to perform his contract to purchase certain lands situate in the Borough of Mantoloking, Ocean County, New Jersey.
Litigation was instituted by the plaintiff when the defendant refused to accept the plaintiff’s proffer of conveyance on the ground that the plaintiff’s title was unmarketable. Albeit the defendant strenuously resists the primary relief sought by the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Breitman v. JaehnalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Lea v. . BridgemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- La Salle v. La PointeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keown v. West Jersey Title and Guaranty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Selectmen of the Town of Nahant v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
- US Trust Co. of New York v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Union Cty. Indust. Park v. UNION CO. PARK COMM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.