Legal Opinion
Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 3, 1958PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BuKiiiire, J.
This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writ. Suit was instituted by plaintiffs, residents and taxpayers of the City of Ocean City, with the object of having several resolutions of the City of Ocean City extending the time for performance of certain conditions in a deed declared invalid, and for the further relief of having lands owned by the defendants forfeited and returned to the city. The parties defendants are Stoeeo Homes, Inc., the purchaser from Ocean City, Workshop, Inc., a subsequent grantee of a portion of the land from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Reichard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Chalker v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Ludlow v. New-York & Harlem RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Firth v. Los Angeles Pacific Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Harrison v. MarcusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- DeHart v. BambrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.