Kniseley v. Ham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Payne County; Á. H. Huston, Judge. Action by W. E. Ham against W. T. Kniseley. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Payne county by W. F. Ham against W. T. Kniseley for trespass in searching his residence. The defendant justified on the ground that he was at the time of the wrong complained of a duly appointed and acting deputy sheriff of Payne, county, and was executing a legal and valid search warrant. The cause was tried to the court and jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum'of $100. From that judgment, the defendant has prosecuted an appeal to this court.
One of the errors complained of is the giving to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Grumon v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Parker v. WalrodCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Howell v. Babcock'sNew York Supreme Court · 1840
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
- State ex rel. Samlin v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Brutsche v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ladd v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.