Legal Opinion

Brutsche v. City of Kent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2008No. 79252-6PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 P.3d 110 (2008)

Leo C. BRUTSCHE, Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation; and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondents.

No. 79252-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 17, 2008.

Decided October 2, 2008.

John Rolfing Muenster, Muenster & Koenig, Jerald A. Klein, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Chloethiel Woodard Deweese, Keller Rohrback LLP, Richard B. Jolley, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

Sofia D'almeida Mabee, City of Yakima— Legal Dept., Yakima, WA, Daniel Brian Heid, City of Auburn,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Federal Way v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Federal Way v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Grundy v. Brack Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Grundy v. Brack Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API