Legal Opinion

The City of Asheville v. Frost

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 2017No. COA16-577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*259Where North Carolina Session Law 2009-401 specifically provides that a petitioner may request a trial by jury and then provides that the matter shall proceed "as any other civil action," the specificity of the session law controls and the trial court erred in denying petitioner's motion to strike respondent's demand for a jury trial.

This matter was first brought before the Civil Service Board of the City of Asheville ("the Civil Service Board") as a quasi-judicial matter on 9 September 2014. The Civil Service Board was tasked with a review of the process by which Senior Police…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Asheville v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API