Legal Opinion
Dekay v. Shorehaven Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
In challenging the correctness of the finding of the trial court, the plaintiffs have annexed to their appeal a transcript of the entire evidence in aid of their claimed corrections, and also made a motion to'correct addresssed to the trial court. . No reasons for. correction appear in this motion, nor do any appear
in the reasons of appeal. In some form the reasons for correction should appear. DeFeo v. Hindinger, 98 Conn. 578, 581, 120 Atl. 314. Passing over, however, this defect of form, we find from plaintiffs’ brief and argument that the reasons for correction consist in considerations of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Snelling v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Andreu v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- Back v. Peoples National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Town of Enfield v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Papas v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Carey v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Parsons v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.