Legal Opinion
Town of Enfield v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaihes, J.
The complaint in this action consists of fifteen counts, the first twelve of which relate to certain claimed defaults of the defendant Hamilton as the tax collector of the plaintiff town for the years 1914-1927, and the last two are general in character. The thirteenth count charges that the surety bond which had been furnished by the defendant Casualty Company to the plaintiff town for the fidelity of the collector, contained a misdescription of the office to which the collector had been elected in that it referred to him as “collector of real property taxes” instead of “collector of taxes”…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Welles v. . YatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Northrop's executors v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- New York Life Insurance v. McMasterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Mrowka v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.