Legal Opinion

Callan v. Hause

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1904No. Nos. 13,743 — (100)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action in trespass instituted before a justice of the peace and certified to the district court for Dakota county. From a judgment in favor of defendant, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Crosby, J., plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

From the findings of fact herein, which are not questioned, it appears that on September 16, 1878, the land described in the complaint and other lands were owned by the plaintiff, Callan, and one Ried, as tenants in common. On that day the lands were divided between these tenants, and by deed each conveyed to the other a part thereof. In the deed from Ried to Callan was this reservation:

“Reserving the right of way to said Ried and assigns for teams and cattle, to pass over the described premises at all times with farming implements

*271and in the deed from Callan to Ried was a like reservation to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway v. Denver and Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Bakeman v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ingelson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Beck v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Century Communications, Inc. v. Housing Authority of Wilson & Site, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Lafleur Et Ux. v. ZelenkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API