Campbell v. Facebook Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on October 1, 2014. Plaintiffs Matthew Campbell, Michael Hurley, and David Shadpour (“plaintiffs”) 'appeared through their counsel, Michael Sobol. Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“defendant” or “Facebook”) appeared through its counsel, Joshua Jessen. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Gonzales v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Baron v. Syniverse CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Doe v. Microsoft CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Hammerling v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.