Legal Opinion
United States v. Terry
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided June 2, 1972No. 24,882PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
DARDEN, Chief Judge:
On pleas of guilty the appellant stands convicted of possessing, selling, and transferring lysergic acid diethy-lamide (LSD). He now challenges the adequacy of the military judge’s inquiry into the factual basis for his guilty pleas, as required by United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247 (1969).
Under Care, the military judge must explain to an accused every element of the offenses charged, question him about his actions and intent, and advise him of the rights a guilty plea waives.
Before accepting the appellant’s pleas in this case the military…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. WimberlyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. BertelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. DawsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. McCrimmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.