Legal Opinion

Two Jinn, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2013No. 38759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

A bail bond company challenges the district court’s decision affirming an order of the Director of the Idaho Department of Insurance. That order, which was based on I.C. § 41-1042, prohibits a bail bond company from contemporaneously writing a bail bond and contracting with a client to indemnify the company for the cost of apprehending a bail jumper. It also prohibits a bail bond company from later requiring a client to agree to such indemnification as a condition of the bond’s continuing validity.

II, Factual and Procedural Background

Two Jinn, Inc. (“Two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Manhattan Buildings, Inc. v. HurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. McCann v. McCannIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hawkins v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Lone Mountain Road Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Peckham v. Idaho State Board of DentistryIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kaseburg v. State, Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kaseburg v. State, Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wilson v. Idaho State Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API