Legal Opinion

Kaseburg v. State, Board of Land Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2013No. 38917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature op the Case

Peter Kaseburg1 is a littoral owner on Lake Pend Oreille who holds an encroachment permit for a series of decaying wooden *572pilings that were driven into the lakebed in the 1930s. With the exception of a single piling that a neighboring marina uses to anchor one of its docks, the pilings have never had any known navigational purpose. Kaseburg applied to the Idaho Department of Lands (“IDL”) for a permit to replace ten of the wooden pilings with steel pilings, but failed to specify any navigational purpose for this proposal. The IDL considered the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dyet v. McKinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wheeler v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grace at Twin Falls, LLC v. JeppesenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API