Kaseburg v. State, Board of Land Commissioners
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
W. JONES, Justice.
I. Nature op the Case
Peter Kaseburg1 is a littoral owner on Lake Pend Oreille who holds an encroachment permit for a series of decaying wooden *572pilings that were driven into the lakebed in the 1930s. With the exception of a single piling that a neighboring marina uses to anchor one of its docks, the pilings have never had any known navigational purpose. Kaseburg applied to the Idaho Department of Lands (“IDL”) for a permit to replace ten of the wooden pilings with steel pilings, but failed to specify any navigational purpose for this proposal. The IDL considered the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Dyet v. McKinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Wheeler v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grace at Twin Falls, LLC v. JeppesenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022