Hergott v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON RETURN TO REMAND
McMILLAN, Judge.
This cause was remanded to the trial court for a determination of whether the barn and garden, in which the marijuana was found, were within the curtilage of the appellant’s home. 554 So.2d 1139. The trial court found that the marijuana was not located within the curtilage of the appellant’s residence. The trial court found that the location of the marijuana was more than 100 yards from the appellant’s residence and that state’s witness, James Horsley, was more than 100 yards from the appellant’s residence when he first observed the marijuana and was,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte HergottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Hergott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte HergottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991