Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Odom
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided August 31, 1995No. Civ. A. 87-1553PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
LITTLE, District Judge.
For the following reasons, this court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The events that first gave rise to this ease occurred more than ten years ago when crop duster Donald M. Johnson was charged with violations of Louisiana’s pesticide laws. On four occasions between 1982 and 1984 the Louisiana Advisory Committee on Pesticides held hearings on these charges and recommended that the Commissioner of Agriculture assess penalties. Johnson v. Louisiana Dept. of Agriculture, 18 F.3d 318, 319…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hale v. HarneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Narey v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. Stoddard (In Re Stoddard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- In Re Lease Oil Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- In Re Nazu, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Sliva v. May (In Re May)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Grudzinskas v. Homeside Lending, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004