Legal Opinion

Grudzinskas v. Homeside Lending, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided January 9, 2004No. 3:00-cv-00556Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WINGATE, District Judge.

Before this court are the motions for summary judgment submitted by defendants Homeside Lending, Inc. (“Home-side”); J. Gary Massey (“Massey”); James E. Lambert, Attorney-at-Law, (“Lambert”); and separately by the defendant J. Tayloe Simmons, Attorney-at-Law. By their motions, all pursued under Rules 56(b) 1 and (c), 2 Federal Rules of Civil Pro cedure, these defendants ask this court to award them a judgment against plaintiff, Gerald L. Grudzinskas, (“Grudzinskas”) because, say defendants, plaintiffs complaint has neither a legal nor any…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API