Legal Opinion

In Re Nazu, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 25, 2006No. 19-30520PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO TEMEKA FARR’S PROOF OF CLAIM AND TEMEKA FARR’S MOTION TO DEEM PROOF OF CLAIM AS TIMELY FILED

JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Nazu, Inc. (the Debtor) commenced this case when it filed its bankruptcy petition on August 6, 2004. [Docket No. 1.] On August 26, 2005, Temeka Farr (Farr) filed a Proof of Claim in this bankruptcy case in the amount of $30,125.00 based on a Default Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc (the Default Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc) rendered against the Debtor in County Court at Law Number 1 of Harris County, Texas (the State Court).…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Henry S. Miller Commercial, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  2. In re the Hyman CompaniesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Adair v. Stutsman Construction, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2024
  4. DEMORY v. MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
  5. In re: Steven Gerald PapermasterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API