Legal Opinion
In Re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 5, 1998No. MDL 1206PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER NO. 21
JACK, District Judge.
On this day came on to be considered Defendant Mobil Oil Corporation’s (“Mobil”) motion to dismiss various claims on full faith and credit grounds and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the above-styled action. After consideration of the briefs filed by several parties and the oral arguments presented on May 15, 1998, the Court DENIES said motion.
I. JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over the consolidated cases in this multidistrict litigation pursuant to the Judicial Panel on Multidis-trict Litigation’s transfer order of January 14, 1998, and 28…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Lease Oil Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- In re Lease Oil Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- In Re Nazu, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
- Poynor v. Chesapeake Exploration Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.